Conducting global oncology trials in rare, genetically defined populations is a formidable challenge—one that demands operational agility, scientific rigor, and deep collaboration.
This case study explores how Precision rescued a multinational, randomized, double-blind Phase 2–3 trial evaluating a targeted therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) characterized by a specific genetic mutation. The story highlights the strategic approaches, operational hurdles, and key learnings that shaped the trial’s success.
Study Overview
The trial enrolled over 400 patients across more than 140 sites in 16 countries, spanning North America, Europe, APAC, and Australia. The study design included:
- Phase 2: Focused on objective response rate (ORR) across two cohorts, with sites in France, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the US.
- Phase 3: Expanded to progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with sites in 16 countries and a broader patient population.
Precision’s involvement ranged from additional site identification, CRO coordination through rescue of project management activities, plus health informatics integration and clinical study report (CSR) preparation.
Key Challenges
1. Slow Enrollment in a Niche Population
Recruiting patients with a specific genetic mutation who had already received prior therapy for metastatic disease proved challenging. Enrollment rates were modest—0.10 patients/site/month in Phase II and 0.09 in Phase III—reflecting the complexity of the population and the competitive landscape.
2. Rescuing Global Coordination Across Regions
Rescuing the study and managing three CROs across diverse geographies required robust communication, harmonized processes, and a shared commitment to data integrity and timely reporting.
3. Site Education and Readiness
Educating sites on the investigational therapy’s unique mechanism of action was essential to reinvigorate the study. Precision leveraged genomic sequencing data and health informatics platforms to match patients to trials, ensuring sites were both scientifically prepared and operationally ready.
-
Biomarkers - Clinical Trial Strategy
Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trials in Oncology: Enrichment, Stratification, All-Comers & Basket
- |
Precision’s Strategic Approach
Leveraging Networks and Informatics
- Site Networks: Precision’s established relationships with oncology sites and key opinion leaders (KOLs) enabled rapid additional site activation and predictable startup processes for study expansion.
- Health Informatics: Access to ICD-10 claims data, genomic sequencing databases, and competitive landscape analysis helped identify new sites with the right patient population and operational capacity.
- CRO Coordination: Precision rescued global coordination and managed three CROs, ensuring consistent execution and alignment across regions.
Operational Excellence
- Competitive Landscape Analysis: Understanding site-level experience and competition was as important as trial staff expertise, allowing for targeted site selection and efficient enrollment
- CSR and Regulatory Support: Precision’s involvement in the CSR process and regulatory preparation streamlined trial documentation and submission.
Outcomes and Impact
The trial met its primary endpoint, demonstrating the clinical value of targeted therapy in a genetically defined population. Precision’s integrated approach enabled operational agility and success across diverse geographies, validating the importance of strategic site selection, genomic targeting, and collaborative execution.
Lessons Learned
- Strategic Relationships Matter: Access to KOLs and established site networks is critical for niche populations.
- Data-Driven Patient Identification: Health informatics and genomic data integration streamline patient matching in biomarker-driven studies.
- Operational Agility is Key: Rescuing global trials requires flexible processes, robust coordination, and a willingness to adapt to evolving challenges.
- Site-Level Experience Counts: Trial success depends not only on staff expertise but also on site-level competitive dynamics and readiness.
Winning the Battle in Biomarker-Driven Trials
This global, biomarker-driven breast cancer trial underscores just how much expertise, collaboration, and adaptability matter when the stakes are high and a Co-ordinating CRO change is enabled mid-study. From navigating slow enrollment and complex logistics to harnessing the power of health informatics and strategic site selection, every step required precision and partnership. The lessons learned here—about the importance of data-driven approaches, operational agility, and trusted relationships—continue to shape how we tackle genetically defined cancers.
As we look ahead, the commitment to innovation and excellence remains at the heart of every trial. If you’re interested in learning more about our approach or exploring how strategic partnerships can drive success in your own studies, click the button below to learn more about Precision Oncology services or connect with our team to get started.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What made patient enrollment challenging in this global breast cancer trial?
A: Recruiting patients with a specific genetic mutation who had already received prior therapy required deep site selection, genomic data integration, and ongoing education for sites. The complexity of the population and competition for eligible patients contributed to modest enrollment rates.
Q2: How did Precision accelerate additional site activation and startup
A: On rescuing the study, Precision leveraged established relationships with oncology sites and key opinion leaders, enabling rapid additional site activation. Real-time feasibility tracking and health informatics platforms helped identify and prioritize high-performing sites for accelerated startup.
Q3: What operational strategies helped maintain data integrity across regions?
A: Rescuing a global trial and coordinating three CROs across 16 countries, Precision implemented harmonized processes, robust communication channels, and centralized oversight to ensure consistent execution and reliable data collection.
Q4: What are the key lessons for future biomarker-driven oncology trials?
A: Strategic site selection, data-driven patient identification, and operational agility are essential. Leveraging health informatics and strong site networks can streamline enrollment and improve trial outcomes in genetically defined populations.